”Every Day, He’s Got A New Format!📞📺”

Look at this precious boy! I love him so much!!!

Just Sanjis Sunny smile 🌞 💕🥰

Poor Jinbe. Also I forgot that Zoro calls Sanji that. I know he calls him other names too bit that just hilarious 🤣🤣

Jinbe just now learning what he got himself into

This is the way I see it and I am in no way a artist. I can't draw to save me life. When an artist says hey I am doing commissions hit me up if you want one. You don't just ask for one and they do it. You have to pay to get it done. Or going to a convention. Artists aren't going to willingly hand over their artwork to you. You have to pay for it. It's the same thing with comic dubs. Saying 'Oh I'm giving you exposure

Hey UT Comic Artists

I want to open a dialog. Lot’s of our art is getting dubs on youtube, but I’ve noticed channels growing and getting quite a lot of views recently, which easily translates into monetization, specifically as the video’s are often watched by young children.

How does this make you feel? Do you think a shout out or credit (Exposure) is an appropriate trade for your work? I’m wondering how the community feels as I’ve never heard of an artist getting payed, but I’m sure the channel is. Do you think it’s okay for dubbers to profit off comic artists while they get only exposure in return?

Ps: when asking to dub, many comic dubbers leave out that they are making money from the channel. How does that make you feel as a part of this community?

♥UNDERTALE♥

骨骨骨Sans骨骨骨

I'm in love with this man! It's kinda a problem.

⌕ hazbin hotel - vox.

like or reblog if you save/use.

Examples of Stockholm Syndrome in Disney

 Frollo and Quasimodo

Mother Gothel and Rapunzel

Frollo and Mother Gothel convince Quasimodo and Rapunzel that their lives are dependent on them. The two villains claim the outside world is a terrible place even though they know this is not true. They also constantly emotionally abuse their victims by implying their worthlessness and destroying their self-esteems. Quasimodo and Rapunzel sympathize with their captors and even believe their captors are protecting them and treating them with kindness. However, both captors are merely using and manipulating their victims for their own selfish purposes.

NOT:

The Beast and Belle

 Belle does not sympathize with the Beast when she is treated poorly. She becomes angry and leaves the castle, only returning by her own wish so that the Beast (who saves her) does not freeze to death. She does not respond nicely towards the Beast until he treats her with respect. In this situation, Belle has control and is not manipulated into feeling for the Beast, nor does the Beast treat her disrespectfully after the first night. While the Beast does have an underlying motive as to keeping Belle in his castle, he abandons this idea and sets her free to make her happy. If anything, this story is a case of Lima Syndrome where the captor starts to sympathize with the victim.

Check out this post which refocuses the purpose of Beauty and the Beast from merely (and wrongly) being about Stockholm Syndrome to it’s original purpose.

As usual, gloomy Husk. Only with a little chic ✨♥️♠️

BLEHHHH >;P