I'm Going To Follow This One Instead Of Your Actual One. Cop That Mate.

Macklemore

Mackerless

420 deport kolech erryday

omfg i am so god dam rich on this game

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I dont use this blog my butt

LIKING THINGS DOESN’T COUNT, I ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY BLOG ON MY OTHER BLOG. JEEZ YOU GUYS.

what the fuck

Reminder that I post things on glory-to-cobrastan and by only following me here YOU'RE LETTING THE LIZARDFOLK WIN

it is my birthday today, here is a timeline of how i got to where i am today

1st row: mysterious, forgotten years of small (primal form)

2nd row: following DISASTEROUS TEEN BOY HELL (not pictured), i start figuring out maybe i could be a girl

3rd row: power increasing, really girlin’ it up now

4th row: current form, very powerful and unstoppable

Wikipedia, for those not familiar, is the largest online encyclopedia. Think Cracked but with slightly fewer fart jokes. Some people want that. Go figure. Despite being such an influential site, Wikipedia has fewer than 10 percent female editors. That leads to some strange problems. For example: The entries on porn stars and Pokemon are both more extensively detailed than the entries on prominent women. This page on American novelists is divided into “Female American Novelists” (for the women-folk) and “American Novelists” (for the men). They once removed all the female movie directors from their list of horror directors.

Basically, it seems like Wikipedia has some weird problems with regard to gender – so what’s up? Well, I was an editor from shortly after it was founded until just a couple of years ago. I am also a trans woman, and I can tell you exactly what’s up.

Wikipedia Hates Women: 4 Dark Sides of The Site We All Use

I mean, most mad "scientists" are really mad engineers.

The rest are generally biologists or chemists who've already, presumably, TESTED what they're about to release on the market.

A true mad scientist would only destroy half of the earth, since the other half is the control group.