i know it’s really easy for us to look at chase and dibala and be like ‘killing dibala was an objective moral good!’ but i wish more people would recognise that for cameron (and foreman) it is actually incredibly difficult if not impossible to look at it objectively. it wasn’t ‘just’ a murder; it was one that took place in direct violation of a hippocratic oath they all swore. it’s one that happened in their workplace, on a patient they were all treating. it wasn’t just a stranger killing another stranger, it was cameron’s husband. foreman’s colleague. surely the trolley problem becomes infinitely harder when the people on the tracks are your friends. surely it becomes infinitely harder when it’s someone you love pulling the lever. how do you begin to disentangle that. the dibala arc was never actually about killing dibala. you know that, right?